Things change quickly in our industry.
While it is great to see the U.S. Congress leading by example on climate change mitigation strategies, this transaction should be seen as one small sign in a broader sea change in U.S. politics surrounding climate change.
The two leading climate bills in the Senate are bipartisan, have largely been well-received, and are designed to accommodate a post-Kyoto international emissions regime. The Lieberman/Warner bill, currently in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, would cap emissions to 70% below 2005 levels by 2050. The Bingaman/Specter bill, currently in the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, calls for a reduction of emissions to 2006 levels by 2020 and to 1990 levels by 2030.
On the campaign trail, nearly all the leading Presidential candidates have
Stated the need for the U.S. to move forward with an emission reductions program Agreed that domestic efforts should dovetail with a post-Kyoto framework
And internationally it is interesting to see that the U.S.’ partner in rejecting the Kyoto Protocol, Australia, appears to be on track for embracing Kyoto. Over the weekend, the newly-elected Prime Minister Kevin Rudd promised to “quickly ratify” the Kyoto protocol, which should further spur the development of carbon trading in Australia, the world’s largest per capita emitter.
How do you think all of these changes will effect the policies and rhetoric? As we’re heading towards the end of 2007 I’d love to her your 2008 predictions.
–Rick
December 1st, 2007 at 1:44 pm
[…] Read the rest of this great post here […]